The Wild Fishing Forum

Open Forums => Open Boards Viewable By Guests => Flies And Tying => Topic started by: Wildfisher on October 14, 2007, 03:09:14 PM

Title: American Fly Patterns
Post by: Wildfisher on October 14, 2007, 03:09:14 PM
During the summer up at Kinbrace John and Martin had a lot of success with patterns like The Grey Wulff (sp?) and the Humpy. People say the Adams is a great all-rounder

Do you use any?
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: haresear on October 14, 2007, 07:05:45 PM
I had a nice sea trout on a royal wulff earlier this season. Humpies work on the Clyde sometimes as well and elk-hair caddis does well for me in fast streamy water.

Alex
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: Malcolm on October 14, 2007, 08:44:52 PM
My favourite river dry flies are variants of the compara dun (or sparkle dun), they're wonderful imitators of upwinged flies.

Malcolm
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: murray1228 on October 16, 2007, 02:01:25 PM
Don't fish the dry as much as i'd like, but the Adams has been very effective for me. It has often outfished more realistic imitations.

Cheers,

Murray
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: Wildfisher on October 16, 2007, 02:05:57 PM
Quote from: Malcolm on October 14, 2007, 08:44:52 PM
My favourite river dry flies are variants of the compara dun (or sparkle dun), they're wonderful imitators of upwinged flies.

Malcolm

Have never used the comparadun and I don?t now why. Basically all the Bob Wyatt DHE is, is a comparadun on a bent hook and I use that fly a lot.  :?
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: Alastair on October 24, 2007, 09:30:34 PM
Comparadun style flies are what I turn to when fish start getting very selective.

As for the McGinty, I know it's supposed to be a good fly for panfish (crappies and pumkinseed etc...) but I don't know anyone who uses it for trout.  It's probably a good fly for perch!!
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: sandyborthwick on October 25, 2007, 05:36:40 PM
Black and Green Montana(variant) tied with a fluffy Maribou tail. Killer for Brownies in spring when the tadpoles are clouding the margins. Just a touch of green chenile for the thorax and not too long on the Maribou for the tail. Slow figure of eight looks like the most convincing tadpole with some weed.

Sandy B.O.
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: .D. on November 11, 2007, 12:13:32 PM
Wright's Royal size 12-16: my "lean-to" searching fly.

Otherwise Elk hair Caddis (and derivatives thereof), Humpy, the Usual and occasionally a Woolly Bugger.

Tends to be hairwing dry flies though  :).



.D.
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: Highlander on December 01, 2007, 07:11:10 PM
The mark of a good fly is that it "travels well" The Adams comes into that category to my mind.
A few others like Comparaduns & the caddis imitive Stimulator all work well for me on occasion.
Tight lines
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: Traditionalist on December 01, 2007, 07:29:05 PM
Most of the American standards will work well when used appropriately. I have used quite a few successfully. Just a matter of taste. Material availability can be a problem with some things, as it is indeed becoming with many traditional materials in the UK and elsewhere.

Don?t really want to raise anybody?s hackles here, but if it were up to me I would ban the massive international trade in UK materials anyway.  After all, there are only so many woodcock, waterhen, snipe, starlings, and various other things.

I have probably annoyed enough people for today!  Time for supper!

TL
MC
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: superscot on December 01, 2007, 09:39:10 PM
QuoteI have probably annoyed enough people for today!  Time for supper!

Mike you are entitled to your opinion on this forum like any body else !And there is no backlash more than i can say for other forums
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: .D. on December 01, 2007, 09:47:30 PM
Quote from: Traditionalist on December 01, 2007, 07:29:05 PM
Most of the American standards will work well when used appropriately. I have used quite a few successfully. Just a matter of taste. Material availability can be a problem with some things, as it is indeed becoming with many traditional materials in the UK and elsewhere.

Don?t really want to raise anybody?s hackles here, but if it were up to me I would ban the massive international trade in UK materials anyway.  After all, there are only so many woodcock, waterhen, snipe, starlings, and various other things.

I have probably annoyed enough people for today!  Time for supper!

TL
MC

I don't know how big the international trade in UK materials is, but wouldn't argue ( you could safely add Golden Plover to the list too). (edit - or how much of it is a by-product of rough shooting)

I even find the internal UK fetish for "quaint" (or illegal)  materials like Heron herl, owl feathers and Water Vole fur grating. It's all well and good acquiring these things from roadkill, poisoned birds left behind by gamekeepers :biglaugh; etc., but I see little merit in promoting their continued use. It only encourages folk to covet things they really shouldn't. And there are always alternatives.


.D.
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: haresear on December 02, 2007, 02:46:54 AM
QuoteAre these not readily available arond rivers and lochs as discarded feathers .D.? 
I'm more than likely wrong, but if people are willing to have a wee walk picking them up and selling them is that not ok?

As you say, Heron feathers are pretty easily come by. I doubt though, if anyone selling them just happens across them...

Alex
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: .D. on December 02, 2007, 12:30:17 PM
Quote from: Ardbeg on December 02, 2007, 02:39:39 AM

 
I'm more than likely wrong, but if people are willing to have a wee walk picking them up and selling them is that not ok?


Ardbeg

I don't think it is OK to sell them. You don't see any legitimate UK flytying suppliers selling UK Heron feathers. Anyway, it's not just the herl: I believe the  hackles are  sought  for some salmon flies, and less readily gathered ( scavenging loose feathers would have been covered under "etc" in my original post).

But that's not really my point. There are loads of things that are easy enough to acquire at the side of the road after they  just happen to get bumped by a car :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
"is that not OK" - well, for some people maybe. It grates with me though. Hence my earlier post.


Cheers,

.D.

Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: Traditionalist on December 02, 2007, 12:48:19 PM
You are quite right of course. Something of a dilemma on my website as well. I give the original materials in many cases, mainly for historical accuracy, but there are plenty of readily available substitutes. A number of  birds and animals have become extinct, at least in Britain, during my lifetime, and a whole host of them before that, and of course elsewhere.

Unfortunately, people still seem to think there is something magical about some materials, and that they will catch more fish if they use them. This is nonsense of course. The reasons for using most of them in the first place was because they were readily available and plentiful.

Personally, I have nothing at all against the use of road-kill or various birds and animals shot etc for other purposes, but the heavy trade in "original" materials puts pressure on the resources.

TL
MC
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: Highlander on December 02, 2007, 02:15:11 PM
I do not see any heavy trade in feathers, in fact I would have thought that it isw very light. OK there has been an upsurge in "Soft Hackle/Flymph" in the USA but in the overall picture it is still a niche market.
Quotethere are only so many woodcock, waterhen, snipe, starlings, and various other things.
Starlings endangered..........I think not. Go into any large town in the UK & Starlings are there in their thousands.
Other that a few specialist companies world wide selling UK based feathers I do not think there is too much of a problem here. Jay for example is classed as vermin in the UK & are readily shot by gamekeepers.
The percentage that reach fly tiers is insignificant. Woodcock too for that matter are hardly thin on the ground here. Now having said that, birds & wild life should be protected & rightly so & as you say substitutes are readily available. But to ban a few suppliers that supply worldwide is not really an answer
to my mind. Still every one to their opinion.
Tight lines
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: .D. on December 02, 2007, 05:05:47 PM
Well, common thought they may be I think declines in Starling numbers are pretty well known. Speaking of species in decline perhaps Red Grouse might be a better example.

Anyway, I didn't hijack this thread  (sorry)  to discuss individual species :lol: .

It just seems a little funny to me that you can kill the occasional trout,post a picture of it on some of these forums/ fora and be knocked from pillar-to- post for doing so. Then you can post a picture of a fly tied with anything that looks nice :?. (and "Lord" knows where the peccary bristles etc. come from!).

Doesn't add up to sense.


.D.
Title: Re: American Fly Patterns
Post by: Traditionalist on December 02, 2007, 05:18:36 PM
Both jays and magpies are very common here, ( as far as I am aware nobody shoots them). I have picked up a half dozen jays or so per year from the roads around here. I have not yet found a dead magpie on the road. the jays are often struck because of their habit of flying low across the road. Usually they hit the windscreen, and are killed outright, but not "damaged" to any great extent. I don?t know why the magpies are not struck more often, probably because of the different flying habits.

There were often jays magpies and squirrels in my garden, but not usually at the same time. Still quite a few red squirrels here. I picked up two dead from the road this year, and saw another one which was unfortunately completely squashed. Greys are however slowly making inroads.

Millions of moles here, they are protected under law, and are a severe nuisance to farmers and others.

TL
MC